<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon &amp; Canon save best? DSLRs for last</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mcnamarareport.com/nikon-and-canon-save-best-dslrs-for-last/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mcnamarareport.com/nikon-and-canon-save-best-dslrs-for-last/</link>
	<description>Insights into Imaging Products, Trends, and Techniques</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 06:34:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.mcnamarareport.com/nikon-and-canon-save-best-dslrs-for-last/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcnamarareport.com/?p=143#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Catchlight: I think it should have been obvious from the beginning of this verbal shootout that we were trying to record a light-hearted segment. Did we miss a few comparisons such as shutter actuations or software bundles? Yep! Blame it on the fact that we didn’t rehearse this segment–or any other segment we’ve done on IDP (not DPR). Thanks for your feedback, I will update the specs list above to reflect your valid concerns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Catchlight: I think it should have been obvious from the beginning of this verbal shootout that we were trying to record a light-hearted segment. Did we miss a few comparisons such as shutter actuations or software bundles? Yep! Blame it on the fact that we didn’t rehearse this segment–or any other segment we’ve done on IDP (not DPR). Thanks for your feedback, I will update the specs list above to reflect your valid concerns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catchlight</title>
		<link>http://www.mcnamarareport.com/nikon-and-canon-save-best-dslrs-for-last/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>catchlight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 14:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcnamarareport.com/?p=143#comment-2</guid>
		<description>&quot;Spirited debate&quot;? Like when you kept repeating over and over that the D90 has video? Or how you &#039;didn&#039;t know&#039; that the D90 was only 12-bit after Scott mentioned that the 50D was 14-bit?

And it sort of continues here. In the alleged interest of equality you list 20 factors for each camera, but when a factor in the Nikon is the same as the Canon -- like the shutter actuations -- you list the info for the Nikon but neglect to note it for Canon, which lets visitors infer that it&#039;s better.

I&#039;m a Nikon user, but it&#039;s quite clear that for people who shoot still photography the more expensive 50D is a superior instrument: 14-bit images, micro-adjustment of lenses, better face-detection, faster shooting, faster write speed with UDMA CF (instead of the slower SD cards used in consumer Nikons), and of course the ability to crop more with those extra megapixels. And what brings the pricing between the two cameras to PARITY with Nikon is when you consider Canon&#039;s included RAW and Live-View remote software -- which runs you $300 extra if you buy a Nikon.

Mike, I really liked your writing on PopPhoto, but in this post and on DPR you and Scott sound a bit like shills more than anything else. I&#039;m sure you two meant to record a light-hearted segment with feature lists, but it really didn&#039;t come across that way to me. It was probably the hokiest thing I&#039;ve heard on DPR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Spirited debate&#8221;? Like when you kept repeating over and over that the D90 has video? Or how you &#8216;didn&#8217;t know&#8217; that the D90 was only 12-bit after Scott mentioned that the 50D was 14-bit?</p>
<p>And it sort of continues here. In the alleged interest of equality you list 20 factors for each camera, but when a factor in the Nikon is the same as the Canon &#8212; like the shutter actuations &#8212; you list the info for the Nikon but neglect to note it for Canon, which lets visitors infer that it&#8217;s better.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a Nikon user, but it&#8217;s quite clear that for people who shoot still photography the more expensive 50D is a superior instrument: 14-bit images, micro-adjustment of lenses, better face-detection, faster shooting, faster write speed with UDMA CF (instead of the slower SD cards used in consumer Nikons), and of course the ability to crop more with those extra megapixels. And what brings the pricing between the two cameras to PARITY with Nikon is when you consider Canon&#8217;s included RAW and Live-View remote software &#8212; which runs you $300 extra if you buy a Nikon.</p>
<p>Mike, I really liked your writing on PopPhoto, but in this post and on DPR you and Scott sound a bit like shills more than anything else. I&#8217;m sure you two meant to record a light-hearted segment with feature lists, but it really didn&#8217;t come across that way to me. It was probably the hokiest thing I&#8217;ve heard on DPR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

