<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The McNamara Report &#187; Nikon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mcnamarareport.com/tag/nikon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mcnamarareport.com</link>
	<description>Insights into Imaging Products, Trends, and Techniques</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:58:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Cover Story On Sub-$1,000 HDSLRs In Outdoor Photographer Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.mcnamarareport.com/cover-story-on-sub-1000-hdslrs-in-outdoor-photographer-magazine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mcnamarareport.com/cover-story-on-sub-1000-hdslrs-in-outdoor-photographer-magazine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 20:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ANNOUNCEMENTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD SLRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordable DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best DSLRs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon T3i]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D3100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony A580]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony SLT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcnamarareport.com/?p=2461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check out the September, 2011 issue of Outdoor Photographer for my comprehensive lineup of the best DSLRs for under $1,000!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><p><img title="cover story sept. 2011" src="http://www.mcnamarareport.com/wp-content/gallery/post-images/cover-story-sept-2011.jpg" alt="" width="570" height="328" /></p>
<p><strong>Ready to upgrade from a compact camera to a more-capable DSLR? Or looking to trade in your old DSLR for a newer, faster, video-capable model that won&#8217;t cost you an arm and a leg? Check out the roundup I wrote in this month&#8217;s Outdoor Photographer magazine.</strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;">INTRO:</span><br />
<strong><a title="Big time DSLRs under $1,000" href="http://www.outdoorphotographer.com/gear/cameras/big-time-dslrs-under-1000.html">Big-Time DSLRs Under $1,000</a></strong><br />
<strong> <em>Packed with power, advanced features and high performance, the latest sub-$1,000 ­­HD SLRs are outstanding options for serious nature photographers<br />
By Michael J. McNamara</em></strong></p>
<p><strong>It&#8217;s hard to believe that the very first DSLR was introduced only 20 years ago, but that&#8217;s ancient history in the world of digital cameras. Priced at an astronomical $26,000 for the basic color model, the Kodak DCS-100 had a jury-rigged, 1.3-megapixel camera back attached to a Nikon F3 film SLR and a shoebox-sized 200 MB hard drive that slung painfully over your shoulder. By today&#8217;s standards, the DCS-100 was a real clunker—but the same can be said of any DSLR that&#8217;s more than five years old, as recent advancements in digital camera technologies have upped the performance ante dramatically in DSLRs from entry level to professional grade. Now, if you&#8217;re a serious photographer who can&#8217;t justify spending several grand on a rugged, full-frame DSLR, or even a pro looking for an affordable, lightweight backup camera and one that just happens to record great video, you&#8217;ll be pleasantly surprised by the features and performance found in DSLRs costing under $1,000.</strong></p>
<p><a title="Big-Time DSLRs for Under $1,000" href="http://www.outdoorphotographer.com/gear/cameras/big-time-dslrs-under-1000.html">READ ARTICLE:</a></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-2461"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom --><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><div class='shareaholic-like-buttonset' style='float:none;height:30px;'><a class='shareaholic-fblike' shr_layout='button_count' shr_showfaces='false' shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mcnamarareport.com%2Fcover-story-on-sub-1000-hdslrs-in-outdoor-photographer-magazine%2F'></a><a class='shareaholic-fbsend' shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mcnamarareport.com%2Fcover-story-on-sub-1000-hdslrs-in-outdoor-photographer-magazine%2F'></a><a class='shareaholic-googleplusone' shr_size='medium' shr_count='true' shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mcnamarareport.com%2Fcover-story-on-sub-1000-hdslrs-in-outdoor-photographer-magazine%2F'></a></div><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mcnamarareport.com/cover-story-on-sub-1000-hdslrs-in-outdoor-photographer-magazine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another RAW camera format? How are we going to handle it?</title>
		<link>http://www.mcnamarareport.com/another-raw-camera-format-how-are-we-going-to-handle-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mcnamarareport.com/another-raw-camera-format-how-are-we-going-to-handle-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 01:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac compatibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raw file]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcnamarareport.com/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We hoped we had seen the last proprietary RAW file format. But Nikon surprised us with another one called .NRW (and the W is for Windows Only!)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><p>Hear my analysis on Inside Digital Photo&#8217;s August 23, 2008 Radio Program (slide forward to the 11:20 min mark to get straight to the report on this topic):</p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana, Helvetica, Arial;"><span>It happened again, just when most photographers had been lulled into thinking we had seen the last new RAW file format. But noooo! Nikon surprised us by giving birth to a new one called .NRW that’s found exclusively in the high-level COOLPIX P6000 (This hot $500 compact boasts a 13.5MP CCD, 28-112mm f/2.7-5.9 stabilized zoom lens, built-in GPS, and up to ISO 6400.) Unfortunately, the Nikon engineers forgot something when they created this new RAW format—and it’s called Mac compatibility! Guess we should have seen that coming with a file extension called .NRW (Nikon Raw Windows).<br />
So while photographers with PC’s running Microsoft Vista (and nothing prior to Vista) will be able to open and adjust .NRW files, the rest of the world is out of luck—unless popular RAW workflow programs like Apple’s Aperture, Adobe RAW converter, and Adobe’s Lightroom come to the rescue as they have in the past.</span></span></p>
<p>I really don&#8217;t expect the development teams at Apple to fret over this new format. After all, few professional photographers–the core base of Aperture users–will be rushing out to get the P6000. And with the plugin architecture of Aperture I would expect a third party (perhaps even Microsoft? Nah!) to develop a plugin that could convert .NRW files into something Aperture and other Mac-based imaging programs could handle.</p>
<p>Funny thing about the Coolpix P6000 though. It has some incredible features and advanced technologies that are being overlooked by the vast majority of the press reports I&#8217;ve seen due to the controversy of the Windows RAW format.  For a compact camera, it offers a great deal, including a dedicated hotshoe that works with Nikon&#8217;s advanced flash system, a sharper LCD monitor than just about any other camera in its class, and built in GPS for tagging photos by location.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mcnamarareport.com/wp-content/images/NikonP6000_600x300px.jpg"></a><a href="http://www.mcnamarareport.com/wp-content/images/NikonP6000_600x300px.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-6" title="Nikon P6000" src="http://www.mcnamarareport.com/wp-content/images/NikonP6000_600x300px.jpg" alt="Another RAW camera format?" width="575" height="300" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.mcnamarareport.com/wp-content/images/NikonP6000Back_400x300px.jpg"></a><a href="http://www.mcnamarareport.com/wp-content/images/NikonP6000Back_400x300px.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-6" title="Nikon P6000 back" src="http://www.mcnamarareport.com/wp-content/images/NikonP6000Back_400x300px.jpg" alt="Another RAW camera format?" width="400" height="300" /></a></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-21"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom --><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><div class='shareaholic-like-buttonset' style='float:none;height:30px;'><a class='shareaholic-fblike' shr_layout='button_count' shr_showfaces='false' shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mcnamarareport.com%2Fanother-raw-camera-format-how-are-we-going-to-handle-it%2F'></a><a class='shareaholic-fbsend' shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mcnamarareport.com%2Fanother-raw-camera-format-how-are-we-going-to-handle-it%2F'></a><a class='shareaholic-googleplusone' shr_size='medium' shr_count='true' shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mcnamarareport.com%2Fanother-raw-camera-format-how-are-we-going-to-handle-it%2F'></a></div><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mcnamarareport.com/another-raw-camera-format-how-are-we-going-to-handle-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/insidedigitalphotoradio/idp080823.mp3" length="20192964" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/insidedigitalphotoradio/idp080823.mp3" length="20192964" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did Nikon shoot itself in the foot with the D700?</title>
		<link>http://www.mcnamarareport.com/did-nikon-shoot-itself-in-the-foot-with-the-d700/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mcnamarareport.com/did-nikon-shoot-itself-in-the-foot-with-the-d700/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 16:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon D700]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcnamarareport.com/?p=5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The D700 is priced 2G less than the D3, but why did Nikon introduce it now when the D3 was in such hot demand? Was Nikon trying to shoot down any remaining sales of the much older, but full-framed Canon 5D?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop --><p>Hear my analysis on Inside Digital Photo&#8217;s July 19, 2008 Radio Program:</p>
<p>The D700 is priced 2G less than the D3, but why did Nikon introduce it now when the D3 was in such hot demand? There’s not much more that the D3 offers over the D700 for the price, and the D700 is lighter and even has a pop up flash to control wireless SB-800s and the new SB-900. Was Nikon trying to shoot down any remaining sales of the much older, but full-framed Canon 5D? I don’t think so—in fact, I think the D700 is just a distraction for a big Nikon coming attraction at Photokina in September.<a href="http://www.mcnamarareport.com/wp-content/uploads/d700_24_120_front34l_l.jpg"></a><a href="http://www.mcnamarareport.com/wp-content/uploads/d700_24_120_front34l_l.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-6" title="Nikon D700" src="http://www.mcnamarareport.com/wp-content/uploads/d700_24_120_front34l_l.jpg" alt="Did Nikon shoot itself in the foot with the D700?" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-5"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom --><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><div class='shareaholic-like-buttonset' style='float:none;height:30px;'><a class='shareaholic-fblike' shr_layout='button_count' shr_showfaces='false' shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mcnamarareport.com%2Fdid-nikon-shoot-itself-in-the-foot-with-the-d700%2F'></a><a class='shareaholic-fbsend' shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mcnamarareport.com%2Fdid-nikon-shoot-itself-in-the-foot-with-the-d700%2F'></a><a class='shareaholic-googleplusone' shr_size='medium' shr_count='true' shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mcnamarareport.com%2Fdid-nikon-shoot-itself-in-the-foot-with-the-d700%2F'></a></div><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mcnamarareport.com/did-nikon-shoot-itself-in-the-foot-with-the-d700/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/insidedigitalphotoradio/idp080719.mp3" length="20317313" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/insidedigitalphotoradio/idp080719.mp3" length="20317313" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

